John
14:6-17
Jesus said to him, ‘I
am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father
except through me. 7If you know me, you will know my Father also. From
now on you do know him and have seen him.’
8 Philip said to
him, ‘Lord, show us the Father, and we will be satisfied.’ 9Jesus
said to him, ‘Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and you
still do not know me? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can
you say, “Show us the Father”? 10Do you not believe that I am in
the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do
not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works.
11Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me; but if
you do not, then believe me because of the works themselves. 12Very
truly, I tell you, the one who believes in me will also do the works
that I do and, in fact, will do greater works than these, because I am
going to the Father. 13I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that
the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14If in my name you ask me for
anything, I will do it.
15 ‘If you love
me, you will keep my commandments. 16And I will ask the Father, and he
will give you another Advocate, to be with you for ever. 17This is the
Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither
sees him nor knows him. You know him, because he abides with you, and
he will be in you.
An Associated Press article on the
religion page of yesterday's Register Guard reported on four different
atheist authors who have recently written best sellers. In 2005 it
was The End of Faith by Sam Harris. Last year The God Delusion by
Richard Dawkins was the best selling attack on religion. This year it
was Daniel Dennett's Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural
Phenomenon. Newest on the block is God is Not Great: How Religion
Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens.
According to the AP article, these
"writers see themselves in a battle for reason in a world crippled
by superstition." In their mind, clerics of the world's religions
are "using fairy tales posing as divine scripture to justify their
lust for power." [my emphasis]
We can discuss the reasons for the
popularity of these books and the building resentment among nonbelievers
over the influence of religion on public policy matters like stem-cell
research, the teaching of evolution, abstinence-only sex education and
our apparent support for continued expansion of Israeli settlements on
Palestinian land, matters which many of us find equally
distressing. But what got my attention and even a little ire was
the suggestion that scripture can be equated with fairy tales. So
let me do a reality check, how many here would say that their faith is
based on a "fairy tale"? How should we respond to such a
claim? Should we be angry? Offended? Defensive?
Or should we take that as a challenge to rethink the central stories of
our faith and how we interpret them in this modern world?
Case in point. Emily Keizer of
Eugene wrote this two-sentence letter to the editor published on Tuesday
in the Register Guard:
In a recent article about
the pope's visit to Brazil (Register-Guard, May 14), a Peruvian bishop
is quoted as saying that people of "pre-Columbus" religions
"hold lots of different beliefs, such as worshiping the Earth or
animals, things that are pretty primitive." So
worshiping animals is primitive, but believing that someone could walk
on water, transform water into wine and bring dead people back to life
is somehow modern and logical?
Ms. Keizer has a good point. In
today's world it will simply not do to call our beliefs
"modern" and someone else's "primitive" or ours
"faith" and theirs "fairy tales". Read again
the story of Pentecost in Acts 2 with its description of the Spirit as
"tongues" of fire and people from 14 different nations who all
hear a bunch of Galilean fisherman speaking their native language
simultaneously. (I don't know about you, but the only time anything like
that has happened to me was after my prostate surgery when I took 2
Oxycodone and for the first time I understood Rush Limbaugh!) Were
that story or the story of the Virgin Birth, the resurrection, the
miracles of Jesus, the story of the Exodus and countless other
miraculous stories found anywhere else other than the Bible, would we
find them credible?
In the Gospel of John, Pilate asks
Jesus the question that is on all of our lips and minds, "What is
truth?" Whether we are discussing the basic tenets of our
faith or everything from abortion to the death penalty, how do we
determine the truth? Remember the old joke about the three
religious leaders debating when life begins? The protestant
minister argued that life begins when you can first hear a heart
beat. No, said the Catholic priest, life begins at
conception. "You are both wrong," said the Jewish rabbi,
"life begins with the youngest child goes to college and the dog
dies." With my first child headed off to college this fall,
her brother not far behind and 2 of 3 pets no longer with us, I am
beginning to appreciate the logic of that argument! Life is about
to begin!
Somewhere early in my childhood I
learned that intelligence had something to do with one's ability to
answer questions. I wanted to be an intelligent person, so I
reasoned that I just needed to answer all questions. It didn't
matter if I actually knew the answer, I just had to be convincing and
people would say, "Isn't he smart?" It worked well until I
tried to tell my east-coast wife (that is, my wife raised on the east
coast-lest you to think I have one on the east coast and one on the
west!) that Atlantic City was the capital of Georgia. Atlanta,
Atlantic City, they all look the same from the west coast.
So what is truth? In modern,
western world we generally define truth by the facts, something that is
provable by observable evidence or sound logic. Hence these atheist
authors try to debunk religion by showing that their arguments are more
logical, that their method on interpreting the world is the correct way
of thinking. Whoever has the most facts, the best logic and the
least contradiction, has the truth.
In such a perspective, how do we lead
someone to the truth of Christian faith? We teach them the right
knowledge, the correct theology and the best way to interpret
scripture. We give our "proof" that God exists, that
Jesus was raised or that he really performed all those miracles.
Once we convince someone of this set of facts, they will see the light
and become Christian.
There is only one problem with such an
understanding of truth. It doesn't work any more. From that
perspective, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and the other religion
protagonists have us beat. So why do I remain unconvinced by their
arguments and insist on the truth of Christian faith? Because it
is a different truth that has more to do with meaning and purpose rather
than facts and logic. And nowhere is this more obvious than in the
Gospel of John.
"Truth" is a key word in
John. In the other three gospels, "truth" occurs only
six times and only once on the lips of Jesus, when Jesus discusses the
widow and Elijah in Luke 4. In John, however, "truth"
appears 25 times, all but four of those on the lips of Jesus. Two
of those four come in the prologue of John where we read, "And the
Word became flesh and we have seen his glory, … full of grace and
truth." (1:14) Again, three verses later, "The law was given
through Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ." (1:17)
Jesus tells his followers, "God is
spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and
truth." (4:24) "You will know the truth, and the truth
will make you free." (8:32) In the passage for this morning,
we read "I am the way, and the truth, and the life."
Jesus then says that the Sprit of Truth will dwell forever in his
followers. (14:6) To Pilate Jesus says, "for this I came into the
world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth
listens to my voice." (18:37)
Thus when we get to Pilate's famous
question, "What is truth?" the last time the word
"truth" appears in John, we clearly see that Pilate and Jesus
are not communicating. Pilate is using courtroom language-he wants
facts, evidence to prove whether Jesus is innocent or the charges
against him are true. Jesus, however, is talking about a greater
truth, truth beyond facts, truth that transforms lives, truth that
reveals all our hypocrisy and shallowness, truth that leads to the very
essence and meaning of life.
Jesus does not answer Pilate's question because this truth cannot be
explained with words or logic, it can only be answered on the cross and
at the tomb. For this truth is God's steadfast love and
faithfulness as brought to life by Jesus, crucified by the world and
raised by God.
How then do we apply this truth to our
need to discern the truth in our every day lives? Let me suggest
seven basic principles or at least thought provokers for discerning
truth in our world today.
First, the ultimate truth is not
contained in the Bible, but in a person. As I and others have said
many times before, the Bible is not THE Word of God, Christ is THE Word
of God, the living Word which became flesh and dwelt among us. The
Bible is a word or words about God which points to THE Word of God who
is for us the definitive revelation of God. This idea is so basic
and yet so crucial to our understanding of faith.
Muslims, for whom the Koran is THE
definitive revelation of God often refer to our commonality as, like
them, being "people of the book." But that is not quite
true. Christians make the same error in thinking that Mohammed is
for Muslims what Jesus is for us. Also wrong.
Instead, Jesus is our Koran and
Mohammed is their Bible, that is, we see Jesus as the primary revelation
of God to us just as they see the Koran as the primary revelation of God
to them. The same is also true of Judaism. Torah, the first five
books of Moses, is the primary revelation of God to the Jews. Thus
Torah is to Jews what Jesus is to Christians. This does not mean
that the revelation of God we see in Christ is superior to any other
revelation, but it does make it different. Understanding that
difference is important for our own faith as well as for interfaith
dialogue.
Second, this means that truth
from a Christian perspective is dynamic, not static. If we see
truth as something that is static, that is, unchanging, then our
approach to contemporary issues will be marked by legalism, moral
literalism, dogma and doctrine. "The Bible says it and that
is good enough for me, end of argument." If we see it as
dynamic, then the truth of Christ will be living truth made relevant to
every situation, reborn in every moment.
In other words, it is not the letter of the law that guides us, but the
spirit of Christ that guides us. Too often we act as if that
spirit is embalmed in the Bible like an Egyptian mummy, impervious to
time and history, but when unwrapped reveals nothing but a cold, dead
body.
Two examples to illustrate dynamic
truth: In the New Testament, slavery and the subordination of
women is accepted as a given part of the social order. Paul
certainly challenged that order but by the time the New Testament era
came to a close, the church had accepted it. Today no church
accepts slavery as acceptable in God's eyes and many churches recognize
and affirm women as equal partners with men in the ministry of the
church. If truth never changes, how could something like slavery
be accepted in the church in the first century but not today? How
could women as equal leaders in the church be OK now and not then?
Perhaps this is the meaning behind the words of Jesus when he says, in
v. 12, that those who believe in him will do greater works than those
done by him. Do we believe that, that we will do greater works
than Jesus? Perhaps ending slavery and women in the ministry are
such works.
Third, the opposite of truth is
not falsehood, but faithlessness. God commanded the prophet Hosea,
"Go take for yourself a wife of whoredom and have children of
whoredom, for the land commits great whoredom by forsaking the
Lord."
Though men and women treat each other
falsely through the practice of prostitution, God treats it as but a
symptom of a much greater malaise, the lack of faithfulness.
Likewise when Jesus is confronted with the woman caught in adultery, he
treats her with respect and mercy, but when he sees religious leaders
who have not been faithful in their tasks, his rebuke is sharp and
swift. If we fail to live what Christ taught us, we deny the truth
for which Christ died.
Fourth, thus evidence of truth
is not correct belief, but obedient action. To put it differently,
it is not creeds but deeds which make us faithful followers of
Jesus. To tell the truth is not sufficient, we must live it.
Fifth, therefore, truth is often
costly and unwelcome. Have you ever heard someone say, "so
and so just doesn't want to know the truth?" Jack Nicholson
plays the rough and tough commander of the base in Guatanamo Bay who
delivers that famous line from the witness stand when grilled by Tom
Cruise in the movie "A Few Good Men." Fed up with the
righteousness of the cocky lawyer played by Cruise in his search to find
the cause of a young Marine's death by hazing, Nicholson at last blurts
out, "You want the truth? You can't handle the
truth!" And then of course proceeds to implicate himself in
the death.
At times we may not want to hear the
truth of the Gospel because it may call for us to change our lifestyles
or to do something like Jonah, called to preach to a foreign city, that
we do not want to do. At other times, we may not want to speak the
truth for fear of its ramifications. Right after Jesus says,
"the truth will make you free," he says to the religious
leaders of Jerusalem, "you are trying to kill me, a man who has
told you the truth." (8:40) So there are certain risks that go with
truth.
But sixth, this truth is always
liberating. If it confines and restricts, it is not the
truth. If it is oppressive, and weighs you down, it is not the
truth. "Come," says Jesus, "my yoke is easy, my burden is
light." Because the truth makes us free, we need not fear
other points of view. Christian people should be the most tolerant
people there are. Let me repeat that. Christian people
should be the most tolerant people there are! Why is it that so
often it appears to be just the opposite?
That does not mean we should tolerate
evil or sin or accept all points of view as equally valid, but if we
truly believe in the truth, then we have no need to censor other points
of view because we can be confident that the truth will always
win. Perhaps not immediately, or even soon, but eventually the
truth comes out and ultimately will be victorious. That, in
essence, is the message of the book of Revelation. God's truth
wins in the end.
Lastly, this truth is found in
community. When Jesus says "the spirit of truth will guide
you," the "you" is plural. It is in the community
of faith where two or three are gathered together, where we worship
together, fellowship together and dialogue with one another that we
discover the truth. It is precisely here in the church that we
should be discussing the pros and cons of abortion, the death penalty,
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, climate change, gun control, whatever
issue you want to name.
Here is where we should engage in open and honest exchange on the
critical issues of our time, respecting all points of view, learning
from each other, challenging one another to go deeper and to seriously
apply our faith to such issues. This is what it means to be
faithful Christians.
If we believe that the spirit of truth
will guide us, if we allow it to guide us, then we will be able to
discuss such difficult issues in love and respect for one another and
then we may find a greater Truth in our midst than we knew we
possessed. Jesus knew. That spirit, he said, would abide
with us and in us.
Such truth, the Spirit of truth, is the
truth we need today more than ever. Let us not be timid in sharing that
truth with the world.